tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35502593709159860962024-03-14T08:15:05.169+08:00LINCOLN RESOURCELINCOLN RESOURCE was created for both students and young lawyers with periodical updatings relating to the present state of the law. All my students can access this site for free.Welcome to LINCOLN RESOURCE AND HAVE A GREAT DAY.- VijayA.VIJAYCHANDRANhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16380796475084172439noreply@blogger.comBlogger244125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3550259370915986096.post-46819627836728560612012-12-09T14:17:00.002+08:002012-12-09T14:17:16.852+08:00COMPANIES: LIFTING THE CORPORATE VEIL<strong><u><span style="color: red;">Hotal Jaya Puri Bhd v National Union of Hotal, Bar & Restaurant Workers[1980]1 MLJ 109 </span></u></strong><br />
<br />
The Federal Court lifted the corporate veil in the interest of justice and upheld the finding of the Industrial Court that Hotel Jaya Puri was the employer of retrenched employees of Hotal Jaya Puri Chinese Garden Restaurent Bhd. A.VIJAYCHANDRANhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16380796475084172439noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3550259370915986096.post-55381615229425548262012-12-09T13:55:00.002+08:002012-12-09T13:56:54.535+08:00ARE COMPANY DIRECTORS EMPLOYEES? The above question was answered in the case of <strong><u><span style="color: red;">Inchcape Malaysia Holdings Bhd v R.B Gray [1985] 2 MLJ 297 .</span></u></strong> It was held that a director cannot be a workman because a director was the very brain of the Company or the directing mind determining and formulating the Company's policy.<br />
<br />
What the above decision means is that the Director does not come under the IRA 1967 and therefore the remedies available under in the Industrial court are not available to him.He has to file a case in the Civil Courts.A.VIJAYCHANDRANhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16380796475084172439noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3550259370915986096.post-48429813279630522372010-09-06T11:58:00.003+08:002010-09-06T12:02:00.219+08:00WARRANT OF AUTHORITY<div style="text-align: center;"><strong>FORM B</strong></div><div style="text-align: center;"><strong>( Rule 4)</strong></div><div style="text-align: center;"><strong>IN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT</strong></div><div style="text-align: center;"><strong>Section 27 of the Act</strong></div><div style="text-align: center;"><strong>WARRANT OF AUTHORITY</strong></div><div style="text-align: center;"><strong>In the matter of Kes No. 4/4-824/10</strong></div><div style="text-align: center;"><br />
Between </div><div style="text-align: center;"><strong>LAI MENG HUA</strong></div><div style="text-align: center;">And </div><div style="text-align: center;"><strong>TAI KWONG BATTERY (KL) SDN.BHD</strong></div><br />
I, LAI MENG HUA, hereby authorise the law firm of VijiaRajan & Associates to represent the Claimant at the proceedings before the Industrial Court in this case.<br />
<br />
He is a legal practitioner appearing by permission of the President.<br />
<br />
Dated this 7th day of JuneSeptember 2010 .<br />
<br />
…....................................<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;"> LAI MENG HUA</div><div style="text-align: center;"> 5C-05-03 Blok C,D ’ Kiara Apartment</div><div style="text-align: center;"> Jalan Wawasan 4/12 Pusat Bandar Puchong </div><div style="text-align: center;">47100 Puchong.</div>A.VIJAYCHANDRANhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16380796475084172439noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3550259370915986096.post-68627518789446769812010-09-05T12:36:00.002+08:002010-09-05T12:37:10.473+08:00COERCION<div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: red; font-size: large;"><strong>A TRUE CONTRACT REQUIRES THE AGREEMENT OF PARTIES THERETO FREELY MADE WITH FULL KNOWLEDGE AND WITHOUT ANY FEELINGS OF RESTRAINT.</strong></span></div><span style="font-size: large;"><div style="text-align: justify;"><br />
</div><strong><span style="color: red;"></span></strong></span><div style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: red; font-size: large;"><strong>POLLOCK & MULLA ON INDIAN CONTRACT AND SPECIFIC RELIEF ACTS 10TH EDITION AT PAGE 117</strong></span></div>A.VIJAYCHANDRANhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16380796475084172439noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3550259370915986096.post-15764141465126062682010-07-08T14:16:00.004+08:002010-07-08T14:19:54.812+08:00[2010] 2 MLJ PAGE 3<div align="center"><strong><span style="color: red; font-size: large;">TAN YIN HONG V TAN SIAN SAN & ORS</span></strong></div><div align="justify">It is trite law that this Court may depart from its earlier decision if the former decision sought to be overuled was <strong><span style="color: blue; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">wrong,uncertain, unjust or outmoded or obsolete in the modern conditions</span></strong>. As it was clear that the Federal Court in the Adorna Properties case had misconstrued S340(1) (2) and (3) of the NLC and thus came to the erroneous conclusion that the proviso to S340(3) applied equally to S340(2), this error needed to be remedied forthwith in the interest of all the registered proprietors.<br />
<span style="color: red; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><strong>PS With the above decison, the principle as laid down in Adorna Properties was unceremoniously buried.</strong></span></div>A.VIJAYCHANDRANhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16380796475084172439noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3550259370915986096.post-90995726413040282712010-07-08T13:52:00.004+08:002010-07-21T19:59:27.842+08:00PROSAIC- ITS MEANING<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><span style="color: purple; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: large;"><strong><em>prosaic - lacking imagination</em></strong></span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: yellow; font-family: "Courier New", Courier, monospace;"></span>A.VIJAYCHANDRANhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16380796475084172439noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3550259370915986096.post-11000495249163066572010-07-07T12:35:00.002+08:002010-07-07T12:35:19.222+08:00The Chancery Division<span style="color: blue; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><strong>The Chancery Division of the High Court undertakes civil work of many kinds, in particular business and property related disputes and including some specialist work such as companies, competition, insolvency and patents and other intellectual property. </strong></span>A.VIJAYCHANDRANhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16380796475084172439noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3550259370915986096.post-52932841036523117192010-07-07T12:30:00.006+08:002010-07-07T12:32:04.915+08:00THE LAW AND ITS IMPORTANCE" Law,says the Judge as he looks down his nose,<br />
Speaking clearly and most severely<br />
Law is as I have told you before<br />
Law is as you know I suppose<br />
Law is but let me explain it once more<br />
<span style="color: red; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><strong><em>Law is the Law."</em></strong></span><br />
<span style="color: blue; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><strong>W.H AUDEN, extract from Law is like Love."</strong></span>A.VIJAYCHANDRANhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16380796475084172439noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3550259370915986096.post-89646225077222478842010-07-06T15:11:00.002+08:002010-07-09T11:20:12.271+08:00LLB,LLM- THEIR MEANINGLLB abbreviation for <strong><span style="color: red; font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;">Latin Legum Baccalaureus</span></strong> [Bachelor of Laws]<br />
LLM abbreviation for <span style="color: blue; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><strong>Latin Legum Magister</strong></span> [Master of Laws]A.VIJAYCHANDRANhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16380796475084172439noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3550259370915986096.post-36887151371027414952010-07-06T13:07:00.002+08:002010-07-06T13:17:16.564+08:00[2009] 9 MLJ p.509<span style="color: red; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><strong>LIM CHENG BOON V F & N DAIRIES (M) SDN. BHD</strong></span><br />
<strong>HIGH COURT - KUALA LUMPUR</strong><br />
<span style="color: blue; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><strong> ISSUE: WHETHER RELATIONSHIP OF AGENCY EXISTED</strong></span><br />
HELD: THERE WAS AN AGENCY BETWEEN THE PLAINTIFF AND THE DEFENDANT BECAUSE THE DEFENDANTS INVOICE MENTIONED THE WORD "SALESMAN" AND WAS GIVEN A CODE NUMBER 2949A.VIJAYCHANDRANhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16380796475084172439noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3550259370915986096.post-74016486230997023062010-07-06T12:06:00.001+08:002010-07-06T12:06:57.014+08:00[2009] 9 MLJ 464<strong><span style="color: red; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">DATO KUAH TIAN NAM V TAN WRUN PENG</span></strong><br />
<span style="color: blue; font-family: Arial;">Whether bankrupt Plaintiff had locus standi to institute proceedings against defendant. Plaintiff adjudicated bankrupt in Singapore.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: blue; font-family: Arial;">Held: Sect 104 of the Bankruptcy Act 1967 provides for reciprocal provisions between Singapore and Malaysia in all matters and bankruptcy. Plaintiff had no locus standi to institute an action here. </span>A.VIJAYCHANDRANhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16380796475084172439noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3550259370915986096.post-74072242294872322362010-07-06T11:57:00.001+08:002010-07-06T11:57:48.131+08:00[2009] 9 MLJ p.328<strong><span style="color: red;">ARCTIC BUILDING AND CIVIL ENGINEERING SDN. BHD V AHMAD ZAKI SDN. BHD & ORS</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: blue; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Plaintiff had relied on letters not pleaded it its claims.</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: black;">Held: The letters of appointment to the plaintiff had categorically showed that it was the third defendant who had appointed the plaintiff to supply sand and earth for the project.A Contract cannot confer rights or impose obligations arising under it to any person except the parties to the contract itself.</span></strong>A.VIJAYCHANDRANhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16380796475084172439noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3550259370915986096.post-32178965892962498222010-07-06T11:52:00.000+08:002010-07-06T11:52:10.000+08:00[2009] 9 MLJ 318<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">BOO ARE NGOR ( Claiming as the lawful trustee of Kim Leng Tze Temple) v Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Muar & Anor</span><br />
<span style="color: red;"><strong>Civil Procedure- Whether 14 days requirement to file affidavit in reply mandatory.</strong></span><br />
<strong><span style="color: blue; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Held: The word 'must' that appears in Order 28 r 3(4) of the RHC requires the 14 day requirement to be mandatorily complied with or otherwise there would be no end to the old habits of filing affidavits at the last minute prompting the other side to seek adjournments.</span></strong>A.VIJAYCHANDRANhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16380796475084172439noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3550259370915986096.post-89462388866382371192010-07-06T11:45:00.001+08:002010-07-06T11:45:34.245+08:00AHMAD NAZARI V PP<strong><span style="color: red;">HIGH COURT - ALOR SETAR- CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 42-11 OF 2005</span></strong><br />
<br />
<strong><span style="color: black;">Criminal Law-Penal Code- S376-Rape- Whether identification parade was unfair</span></strong><br />
The accused was charged under S376 of the Penal Code with two seperate offences of raping a 63 year old female rubber tapper.<br />
<strong><span style="color: blue; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Held: The identification parade were made up of members of the public and inmates from the lock-up</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: red; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Sentence- 14 years imprisonment and six strokes of whipping</span></strong>A.VIJAYCHANDRANhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16380796475084172439noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3550259370915986096.post-1762861405385421452010-07-05T15:02:00.001+08:002010-07-05T15:06:25.167+08:00SEQUESTRATION <strong><span style="color: red;"> SEQUESTRATION-ITS MEANING</span></strong><br />
<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><strong>Legal Meaning </strong></span><br />
<span style="color: red;"><strong>a. Seizure of property.</strong></span><br />
<span style="color: red;"><strong>b. A writ authorizing seizure of property.</strong></span><br />
<strong><span style="color: blue; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> sequestration - seizing property that belongs to someone else and holding it until profits pay the demand for which it was seized </span></strong>A.VIJAYCHANDRANhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16380796475084172439noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3550259370915986096.post-9367428689655255622010-07-05T14:56:00.000+08:002010-07-05T14:56:58.549+08:00AKTA PERHUBUNGAN PERUSAHAAN 1967<strong><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: red;">"dengan niat jahat"</span> ertinya melakukan suatu perbuatan salah sengaja tanpa sebab atau alasan yang adil, sama ada sejajar dengan pertikaian perdagangan atau tidak;</span></strong>A.VIJAYCHANDRANhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16380796475084172439noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3550259370915986096.post-27490271020791791492010-07-05T13:47:00.005+08:002010-07-05T20:43:18.694+08:00PP V DULAMIT & ANOR<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgJwCYB9xg9IFkCmNZY1DXCDBBTfhbB59Wqt7ekXe4ygJ0iSc9EV4qFX1nAKbCPCRvj16fAwDm9_9ROR4QV7XvDozIJodki-2T05Tvo-jOgRD7GJUC-tXeoKDwgn7dODfj8-XqeNhHTJTw/s1600/guiness.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; cssfloat: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" rw="true" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgJwCYB9xg9IFkCmNZY1DXCDBBTfhbB59Wqt7ekXe4ygJ0iSc9EV4qFX1nAKbCPCRvj16fAwDm9_9ROR4QV7XvDozIJodki-2T05Tvo-jOgRD7GJUC-tXeoKDwgn7dODfj8-XqeNhHTJTw/s320/guiness.jpg" /></a></div><div style="border-bottom: medium none; border-left: medium none; border-right: medium none; border-top: medium none;"><div style="border-bottom: medium none; border-left: medium none; border-right: medium none; border-top: medium none;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEidS1325B3zYAZ9Pg-cW7zXJ1acmmxrelJaNI9K6fVpBobKebmSOxqIKMKgDxTMlummAnaLuZ2lm2CfV4_CPmmPq0stLTFUZlByWgvzGWtOLdhD0lIuRJo10u2-qtVoRqSf2a6h9naA3RE/s1600/guiness.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; cssfloat: right; cssfloat: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" rw="true" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEidS1325B3zYAZ9Pg-cW7zXJ1acmmxrelJaNI9K6fVpBobKebmSOxqIKMKgDxTMlummAnaLuZ2lm2CfV4_CPmmPq0stLTFUZlByWgvzGWtOLdhD0lIuRJo10u2-qtVoRqSf2a6h9naA3RE/s320/guiness.jpg" /></a><span style="color: red;"><strong>HIGH COURT [ SHAH ALAM]- CRIMINAL TRIAL </strong></span></div></div><div style="border-bottom: medium none; border-left: medium none; border-right: medium none; border-top: medium none;"><span style="color: red;"><strong>[2009] 9 MLJ P.249</strong></span></div><br />
<br />
<br />
<strong><span style="color: blue;">FACTS:</span></strong> The 2 accused went out and consumed <strong><em><span style="color: orange;">MANY<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"> </span></span></em></strong>bottles of beer and stout. Peddlar tried to sell CD.Stout drinkers declined. CD seller abused them verbally.One accused whacked him over the head with a plastic chair -second accused smashed a flower pot over the deceased head. Deceased gave up the ghost.The 2 arrested and charged.Both pleaded guilty.<br />
<span style="color: blue; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><strong>Held: Convicting both the first and second accused and sentencing them to nine years and six years respectively.</strong></span>A.VIJAYCHANDRANhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16380796475084172439noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3550259370915986096.post-7221683595627262162010-07-05T13:35:00.001+08:002010-07-05T21:03:34.515+08:00SHANGRI LA HOTEL ( KL) SDN. BHD V KESATUAN KEBANGSAAN PEKERJA2 HOTEL<strong><span style="color: red;">[2009] 9 MLJ 242</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: red;">HIGH COURT ( KUALA LUMPUR) APPLICATIOIN FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW NO R1-25-102 OF 2007</span></strong><br />
<span style="color: black;"><span style="color: blue; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">The Industrial Court was limited and restricted only to issues referred to it by the Minister by on order of reference</span>.</span>A.VIJAYCHANDRANhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16380796475084172439noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3550259370915986096.post-51172350271274624772010-07-03T13:06:00.000+08:002010-07-03T13:06:03.935+08:00CHONG KOW V KESAVAN GOVINDASAMY<span style="color: red;"><strong>[2009] 8 MLJ P. 41</strong></span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: black; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><strong>Contract- Illegality- Passport used as security- Whether loan breached Passports Act 1966.</strong></span><br />
<strong><span style="color: blue; font-family: Arial;">Held: The loan agreement was an illegal contract as it was forbidden by law </span></strong>A.VIJAYCHANDRANhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16380796475084172439noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3550259370915986096.post-40104473337309911912010-07-01T13:37:00.004+08:002010-07-05T13:28:40.673+08:00PP V THURAIRAJ[2009] MLJ 9 P. 40<br />
HIGH COURT - SHAH ALAM - CRIMINAL TRIAL NO 45-114 OF 2005<br />
CRIMINAL LAW - MURDER<br />
<strong><span style="color: red;">Facts : On Dec. 13 2003 a partially burnt corpse of an adult male was found at the edge of the road in Lipat</span></strong><span style="color: red;"> </span><strong><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="color: red;">Kajang</span>.</span></strong> <strong><span style="color: red;">Accused arrested and charged.</span></strong><br />
<span style="color: blue;"><strong>In the course of cross examination, the accused<em><span style="color: purple;"> <span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">began to give details</span></span></em> pertaining to the incident on the afternoon of 12 December 2003.</strong></span><br />
<span style="color: blue; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Held. On the totality of the evidence, it was established that the accused intended to kill the victim.</span>A.VIJAYCHANDRANhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16380796475084172439noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3550259370915986096.post-4976141914542743452010-07-01T13:28:00.000+08:002010-07-01T13:28:14.647+08:00RH BANK BHD V UJANG BIN CHE DAUS[2009] 9 MLJ PAGE 29<br />
HIGH COURT [ KUALA LUMPUR] SUIT NO D2-22-3968<br />
<strong><span style="color: red; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Issue : Share financing facility- Forms signed by borrower.</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: blue; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Held: It was clear to the Court that the Defendant did sign the share financing facility agreement.He was therefore bound by it.The Defendant was neither illeterate nor did he plead non est factum ( not my deed)</span></strong>A.VIJAYCHANDRANhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16380796475084172439noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3550259370915986096.post-57154665641852414992010-07-01T13:20:00.000+08:002010-07-01T13:20:02.179+08:00CALEY OTOTO WORLDWIDE SDN. BHD V SUN WEN LONG<strong><span style="color: red; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">[2009] 9 MLJ PAGE 1 HIGH COURT KUALA LUMPUR - CIVIL SUIT NO S3-22-496</span></strong><br />
ABDUL MALIK ISHAK<br />
<strong>Issue: Whether testimony of material witness can be adduced through third person.</strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: blue; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Held: It is trite that witnesses must give their testimony orally in Court, <em>and must testify only to matters within their own first hand knowledge.</em></span></strong>A.VIJAYCHANDRANhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16380796475084172439noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3550259370915986096.post-68885845635485037072010-06-30T14:34:00.001+08:002010-06-30T14:34:53.059+08:00PP V DULAMIT BIN SULAIMAN & ANOR[2009] 9 MLJ P. 249 HIGH COURT-SHAH ALAM <br />
NALLINI PATHMANATHAN JC <br />
<br />
CRIMINAL LAW- MURDER-POST MORTEM REPORT-PATHOLOGIST REFUSED TO TESTIFY<br />
<span style="color: red; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><strong>Held: Although the pathologist could not be called as a witness the post-mortem report was admissible in evidence under S340 of the Criminal Proceure Code.</strong></span>A.VIJAYCHANDRANhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16380796475084172439noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3550259370915986096.post-57580020059944575792010-06-29T13:31:00.002+08:002010-06-29T13:32:28.966+08:00WESTWOOD V THE POST OFFICE<span style="color: red;"><strong>ALL ENGLAND REPORTS 1973 page 283</strong></span><br />
<span style="color: red;"><strong>COURT OF APPEAL , CRIMINAL DIVISION </strong></span><br />
<strong><span style="color: black;">Employee trespassing into another room and fatally injured by falling through trapdoor- Whether Employer liable.</span></strong><br />
<strong><span style="color: blue;">Held: The ordinary plain common sense of the matter is that the deceased brought his death on himself by disregarding the notice.</span></strong>A.VIJAYCHANDRANhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16380796475084172439noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3550259370915986096.post-6741912650635702062010-06-28T14:50:00.003+08:002010-06-28T14:51:40.195+08:00LNS- ITS MEANING<span style="color: blue; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><strong>The Legal Network Series is a compilation of cases that have not been published by MCLJ. [Malayan Current Law Journal]</strong></span>A.VIJAYCHANDRANhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16380796475084172439noreply@blogger.com0